Conflict is often perceived as a threat to team dynamics, but when handled correctly, it can be the spark that ignites creativity and innovation. The key to turning conflict into a positive force lies is the trust factor. Without a bedrock of trust, teams shy away from difficult conversations, and conflict is often a destructive force and negative rather than constructive and positive. When Trust has been established, conflict transforms into a powerful driver of innovation.
In this blog, we’ll explore why trust is the foundation of healthy conflict. “… trust is the confidence among team members that their peers’ intentions are good, and that there is no reason to be protective or careful around the group.” Patrick Lencioni. To frame this I will highlight three common factors that undermine creative conflict when trust is absent and offer three actionable steps you can take to build trust within your teams.
Why Trust is Essential for Creative Conflict
In his book The Five Dysfunctions of a Team, Patrick Lencioni describes the absence of trust as the primary dysfunction that leads to a breakdown in teamwork. Trust is the bedrock upon which all other elements of team collaboration are built. When team members trust one another, they feel safe to be vulnerable, express dissenting opinions, and engage in constructive conflict. Lencioni argues that without trust, team members fear conflict, avoiding difficult conversations that could lead to innovation.
Stephen M. R. Covey, in his book The Speed of Trust, reinforces this idea by highlighting that trust is not only a lubricant for relationships but also a catalyst for speed and efficiency. Trust accelerates everything, including the creative process, because it allows people to be open, authentic, and willing to engage in the kind of healthy conflict that generates new ideas.
In contrast, a lack of trust slows teams down. Fear of being judged or punished for mistakes prevents team members from speaking up, and as a result, valuable insights and creative ideas are often left on the table.
3 Factors That Undermine Creative Conflict When Trust is Absent
When trust is missing from a team, conflict can be toxic, damaging relationships and stifling creativity. Here are three key factors that undermine creative conflict when trust is absent:
1. Fear of Vulnerability
Lencioni emphasizes that trust begins with vulnerability. When team members don’t feel safe to be vulnerable, they won’t share their true thoughts or ideas. Instead, they’ll stay silent or only offer surface-level input, robbing the team of the deeper insights that come from open, honest communication. Without vulnerability, conflict becomes defensive rather than constructive.
2. Avoidance of Difficult Conversations
Teams without trust tend to avoid conflict altogether. This avoidance, described by Lencioni as the “fear of conflict,” leads to a culture where difficult but necessary conversations don’t happen. When people are unwilling to address disagreements or challenge each other’s thinking, innovation stagnates. Avoidance of conflict is a direct consequence of a lack of psychological safety in a team.
3. Misinterpretation of Motives
In low-trust environments, team members are more likely to assume disagreements are personal attacks rather than healthy debate. Covey explains that when trust is low, suspicion is high, and people tend to misinterpret each other’s intentions. This breeds a defensive, us-versus-them mentality that prevents teams from engaging in the kind of open conflict/disagreement that leads to creative problem-solving.
3 Steps Leaders Can Take to Build Trust
Building trust within a team is essential to creating the conditions for creative conflict. Here are three steps leaders can take to foster trust and unlock their team’s potential for innovation:
1. Encourage Vulnerability by Modelling It
As Lencioni points out, trust starts with vulnerability, and leaders must lead by example. Leaders go first. As a leader, share your own struggles, admit your mistakes, and be transparent about your challenges. When you model vulnerability, you give your team permission to do the same. This openness creates a culture where people feel safe to express their opinions, even when those opinions differ from the norm.
2. Establish Clear Expectations Around Conflict
Trust doesn’t mean conflict-free; it means that conflict is healthy, respectful, and productive. As leader, you set the tone by establishing clear norms around conflict. Encourage your team to challenge ideas and engage in debate, and make it clear that personal attacks and defensiveness won’t be tolerated. When expectations around conflict are clear, team members are more likely to feel safe engaging in the kind of dialogue that leads to innovation.
3. Create Small Wins to Build Trust Over Time
Trust isn’t built overnight; it’s the result of consistent actions over time. Covey describes the importance of building trust incrementally through small, repeated actions. Start by creating opportunities for small, low stakes wins. Whether it’s tackling a minor project together or having an honest conversation about a small issue, each win builds trust and confidence in the team’s ability to handle conflict constructively.
Trust Unlocks the Creative Power of Conflict
At the heart of every innovative team is a foundation of trust. When trust is present, conflict becomes a creative force, unlocking new ideas and solutions that wouldn’t emerge otherwise. Without trust, teams avoid conflict, misunderstand each other’s motives, and miss out on the potential for true innovation.
Takeaway: Leaders, the responsibility to build trust within your team starts with you. Encourage vulnerability, set clear expectations around conflict, and create small wins to foster trust over time. By doing so, you’ll create the conditions for the kind of healthy conflict that drives creativity and innovation.
References
Lencioni, Patrick. “The Five Dysfunctions of a Team: A Leadership Fable”. Jossey-Bass, 2002, p. 195-197.
Covey, Stephen M. R. “The Speed of Trust: The One Thing That Changes Everything.” Free Press, 2006, p. 13, 32, 40.
Photo by krakenimages on Unsplash